Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
If the entire world reduces CO₂ emissions dramatically — about 70% — it means just slightly lower burned area in 2100 It should be obvious that zoning and forest management is much quicker, cheaper and will help many more people better, fasterpic.twitter.com/bvXOdhtXq7
More houses and more houses are being built in high-risk areas for wildfires Maybe our first wildfire policy should focus much more on stopping people from building in vulnerable areas? And then better fire regulation for those who stay? https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162520304157 …pic.twitter.com/I6s1yxjBf0
Despite breathless climate reporting about ever-more fires US fires burn 5-10x less today Even with extreme warming, area burned stays about same across century Climate does increase burned area, but zoning and forest management much more important https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1353012739736817666 …pic.twitter.com/6vb7xr9oJr
When I worked on Smokey Bear advertising in the mid-80s, rangers took us on a tour of the wildlife-urban interface and one burned home after another. They pointed to new subdivisions with indefensible positions. Few listen.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
