@MaxCRoser did you know that you two seem to be writing about the same stuff atm? (contentious statement I know).
Climate campaigners worried that people won't support net-zero if they have to pay the actual cost The solution, they say, is to subsidize Read: The solution is to hide the cost (subsidies still get paid via taxes, but now less visible)https://inews.co.uk/news/environment/heat-pump-subsidies-gas-boilers-green-heating-1023342 …
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Also, they're driving up the costs of fossil fuels by making it more difficult to increase supply. We're going to pay a lot more for energy either way.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
My neighbours are burning wood with their government subsidized wood burning stoves and I'm paying the actual cost. The smoke gets into my house and into my lungs.
#FakeRenewablesKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
100% subsidies might do it!
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
At many public talks on climate solutions and renewables, whether they were held by actual scientists or just "science communicators" I have found the same question always pops up: "who's gonna pay for that?" People know they're being gutted.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Err yeah.. subsides we pay back in tax.. thanks
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.