Better a judge than a poli-sci statistician.
Who authorized judges to make climate policy? Of course, judges shouldn't make climate policy: *Democracies* have to make the costly decision to limit emissions (Moreover, did Shell emit the CO₂, or the drivers, when they pumped the gas and burnt it?) https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.faz.net%2Faktuell%2Fwirtschaft%2Fklima-energie-und-umwelt%2Fnach-dem-shell-urteil-warum-richter-keine-klimapolitik-machen-sollten-17363077.html&sandbox=1 …pic.twitter.com/dkAaKqLc6r
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Is Norway with a market share of >50% e-cars a climate trendsetter, or is Norway because of his fossile energy distribution a "climate sinner"?pic.twitter.com/7eu1NtNQoh
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
This is also a problem in America, as judges become unelected supreme legislators - eager to make laws and override elected officials. Power is the ultimate addictive drug.https://fabiusmaximus.com/2020/06/28/our-black-robed-legislature/ …
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
The judge made a ruling without evidence. Computer simulations are the opinion of the person who wrote the simulation. How important is the atmospheric window that is transparent to radiation from pole 12µm to equator 9.66µm to hot desert in middle east 8.97µm. CO2 slows < -80C.pic.twitter.com/gmFMEPR8iL
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.