Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Remember the big, global shut-down much of last year from Covid? It had 𝗻𝗼 impact on climate: "we could not detect any associated impact on temperature or rainfall" To actually have an impact on climate, you need Covid-reductions 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 year https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020GL091883 …pic.twitter.com/ZEiLEUFcwu
Actually, the UN wants *another* reduction equivalent to the Covid shutdowns 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 year So reductions equivalent to 2 shutdowns this year, 3 in 2023 etc. Equivalent to 𝟭𝟭 𝘀𝗵𝘂𝘁𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻𝘀 𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿 by 2030 https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/E_infographics_13.pdf …pic.twitter.com/bl5o0LSTQg
To reach weaker climate goals, we need reductions equivalent to one more Covid shutdown every second year So reductions equivalent to 2 shutdowns in 2022, 3 shutdowns in 2024 etc. Equivalent to 𝗳𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝘂𝘁𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻𝘀 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿 in 2030https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/mar/03/global-lockdown-every-two-years-needed-to-meet-paris-co2-goals-study …
That's sheer lunacy, the world economy would be completely ruined if that was attempted.
"MAY result" Is there any data to support that assertion? I'd think that would be a slam dunk.... Wait.... https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Abhijit-Mitra-4/post/What-is-Corona-news-in-scientific-research/attachment/5e98a7d14f9a520001e05287/AS%3A881019129434115%401587062737595/download/COVID+19+LOCKDOWN+AND+AIR+QUALITY.pdf …pic.twitter.com/yBFljMJwZl
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
