Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Remember the big, global shut-down much of last year from Covid? It had 𝗻𝗼 impact on climate: "we could not detect any associated impact on temperature or rainfall" To actually have an impact on climate, you need Covid-reductions 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 year https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020GL091883 …pic.twitter.com/ZEiLEUFcwu
Actually, the UN wants *another* reduction equivalent to the Covid shutdowns 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 year So reductions equivalent to 2 shutdowns this year, 3 in 2023 etc. Equivalent to 𝟭𝟭 𝘀𝗵𝘂𝘁𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻𝘀 𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿 by 2030 https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/E_infographics_13.pdf …pic.twitter.com/bl5o0LSTQg
To reach weaker climate goals, we need reductions equivalent to one more Covid shutdown every second year So reductions equivalent to 2 shutdowns in 2022, 3 shutdowns in 2024 etc. Equivalent to 𝗳𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝘂𝘁𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻𝘀 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿 in 2030https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/mar/03/global-lockdown-every-two-years-needed-to-meet-paris-co2-goals-study …
Ah yes. In other words, the quantiles, which only the emissions modellers know about and obsess over. The voting public is completely unaware that the quantiles are a statistical version of “give an inch, take a mile” esp when they go careering on past 2030, cutting relentlessly
Men Bjørn- det er jo det de ønsker sig i WEF... sammen med den dertilhørende fattigdom...
CO2 increase continued at the same rate.
What was actually shut down for much of the year, globally? Numbers? Do you really think climate change is such a short term phenom?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
