Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Swiss Re finds that even *worse* than the *worst* of the worst-case temperature rises will cost 2.2% of GDP But because this is not enough, they simply multiply it by 10x It gets more attention and likely sells more insurance But despicable analysis https://www.swissre.com/institute/research/topics-and-risk-dialogues/climate-and-natural-catastrophe-risk/expertise-publication-economics-of-climate-change.html …pic.twitter.com/DpVElWiWVB
Swiss Re finds that even *worse* than the *worst* of the worst-case temperature rises will cost 2.2% of GDP But because this is not enough, they simply multiply it by 10x It gets more attention and likely sells more insurance But despicable analysis https://www.swissre.com/institute/research/topics-and-risk-dialogues/climate-and-natural-catastrophe-risk/expertise-publication-economics-of-climate-change.html …pic.twitter.com/6qFEVdbqQM
(I should have copied @RogerPielkeJr as I know he tracks RCP8.5 misuse diligently!)
So safely suggesting to Informed readers it’s closer to 2.2 but the chart is for effect only?
Hola, the unroll you asked for: New "research" from insurance giant Swiss Re finds that climate… https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1386605570497695745.html … See you soon. 
Maybe that is a way to entice insurers to buy additional reinsurance 
As always, when it comes to scary alarmist climate crap, follow the money! Exaggeration and fabrication to enhance scary stories is all about justifying increased premiums. So called “Climate Scientists” do it to seek more public grants. The IPCC lies facilitate the cash flows.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
