Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Hilarious (and quite off) replies from committed climate alarmists to my graph Contrary to breathless climate reporting, Australia wasn't "ablaze" in 2019-20 Burned area was actually one of the *lowest* since 1900 https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1368550005787787270 …pic.twitter.com/98rJ6BvGS2
Many said "but <reasons> reduced fire" Of course, but *we were never told fire declines* None of the breathless reporting said: "Burned area has declined dramatically, and is now at historical lows" Instead, they said "Australia is on fire, literally" https://www.nbcnews.com/science/environment/australia-fire-literally-so-are-its-climate-politics-n1104351 …pic.twitter.com/hfPdFQLPFH
Many chastised me for using "wrong measure" of "burned area" Yet, I use same measure as official "Australia's Environment" annual overview It also concludes "well below average" I suspect "wrong measure" means "doesn't support scary story" https://www.wenfo.org/aer/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/ausenv_2020MYU.pdf …pic.twitter.com/HCNK2h4WYt
Many said "but eucalyptus forests burned much more" Yes, I said so repeatedly But it's inconsistent with climate models: Total should be more, but was much less Forests burned way too much Grass should be larger, were way smaller Woodland way too smallhttps://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1368550021818421249 …
Climate change is real, and it will likely lead to larger burned area by 2100 This model shows 2100 will get us back to the larger fires of early 2000s We need to inform well, not scare the pants off people https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/104015 …pic.twitter.com/t6EkWOd4JE
Forests have also been shrinking lots over the last 100 years due to harvesting. It is disingenuous to compare present vs historic burns without taking that into account. You can't take away all the forests and say "look there are fewer forest fires, climate change is a hoax."
good thing nobody is saying climate change is a hoax then
Haha "breathless" is a perfect description... educated just enough to be dangerous, but not enough to draw sober conclusions.
All this tweet does is reveal that you don't understand fire regimes and how fire behaviour differs across different fuel types. You should leave the commentary to those who actually understand what they're talking about.
Agree, the fires in 2009 were far more deadly with 178 dying one Satuday at Marysville.
You're right Bjorn. The entire country wasn't ablaze. The thing is though that a very large proportion of our population leaves on the Eastern seaboard which, for months, most certainly was.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
