This is a false claim and @mattwridley knows it. The 4.3% figure does not appear in the meta-analysis and was instead concocted by @BjornLomborg, a fact that @mattwridley hides from the reader. These two cannot be trusted to tell the truth about climate change.https://twitter.com/mattwridley/status/1357603023489536007 …
-
-
No it isn't. The sample included a study in India but nothing from North America. Even the feeble
@IpsoNews ruled that was a false claim. -
So Mr ward what is the number according to your read of the models? (And do I get this right, this is vegetarianism not veganism, so some animals would still be farmed for leather, eggs, milk and so on right?)
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.