-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
The debate has become so polarized that it’s akin to the Spanish Inquisition.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Yet this author who's been vilely attacked by Mann still defends Mann's unethical publication. Ted Nordhaus seems like a reasonable guy, but he can't just stop with saying that Mann is wrong about himself but right in slandering climate skeptics.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Really well said. Good read.



@TedNordhausKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
He
fears me so much, he
blocked me before I could say a word.Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
@TedNordhaus One thing Ted Nordhaus gets wrong is that the behaviours he attributes to Herr Doktor Professor Mann were apparent immediately after MBH98 was published. Requests to see his data were flatly refused. Questions about the +/- 0.1°C margin in 1400 were sneered at... -
Mann started Real Climate to control the discussions around MBH98 and MBH99, and fend off serious re-analysis by McIntyre et al. Here they moderated serious probing question away. Stephen McIntyre started Climate Audit so his questions and answers could be discussed openly.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
"Nor have I ever had any particular beef with the hockey stick graph or his work as a scientist." What? Maybe put a small fraction of your overall effort to investigate that first.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.