How about for the average person in the non-rich world?
UN define two futures: Sustainable and Fossil fuels Climate damages clearly greater with fossil fuels But even discounting climate damages, average person in rich world will be much better off in a Fossil fuel world Read my 2020 peer-reviewed article: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162520304157 …pic.twitter.com/xj0JXwN6BV
-
-
-
Is there any data showing correlation or lack thereof between oecd gdp changes and non-oecd? Probably the first thing to look into.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I appreciate that you're at least attempting to point out the economic trade-offs, but I'm not convinced a colder world is better. Warmth brings life, universally across this planet. Would you rather try to survive in the Arctic, or in Hawaii? Where does life thrive better?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.