Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Contrary to breathless media reporting, climate-related deaths have dropped 96+% over the past century 1920s average: 485,000 1910s average: 18,357 2020: 8,086 Less climate alarm, please https://www.facebook.com/bjornlomborg/photos/a.221758208967/10159902009513968/?type=3 … Update of my peer-reviewed 2020 article https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162520304157 …pic.twitter.com/hYBUNmhsJX
Climate change is a real challenge, but increased wealth and adaptive capacity vastly overshadow any negative impact from climate Climate panic crowds out smart climate policies You can see more in my new book (and read first 25p free): http://ow.ly/HUkU50A9v1o pic.twitter.com/N5AdIJanL5
Of course, it should read 1920s average: 485,000 2010s average: 18,357 (*not* 1910s) 2020: 8,086
Sure. Many in the press—not scientists—claim that climate change is literally an existential threat to the human race. There is literally no science to back that.
Where are your 1910 and 1920 figures from and how reliable are those figures?
Peer reviewed. Ever heard of this word?
You only demonstrated that science and technology during the 20th century made great progress allowing prevention of climate related death with no relation with climate change, which consequences juste begin to occur
Which climate change might that be? Surely the great arbiter would be sea level and do we see a meaningful acceleration- hmmm no!
This is a similar argument for a bridge that is deemed unsound by an engineer. If you argued that the bridge is obviously sound because more people have crossed it in the last ten years and not fallen off because of safety barriers. Will the bridge collapse still though?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
