Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Hi Bjorn, some of your lovely followers are contributing to the discussion in my thread. They're all climate deniers - I wonder why? Anyway, I'm not interested in talking to you. I provided a reality check for those who care. You're a lost cause.
Hi Julia, some of *ur* followers are contributing to the discussion in my thread. They're all using vituperation without arguments - I wonder why? Anyway, I think it would be good for the world if you engaged in convo on climate cost-benefit Hope you're not a lost cause ;)
Cost: some amount of arbitrarily worthless paper money printed by gov’t Benefit: perhaps not walking face first into a potential extinction event a few hundred generations from now, while creating jobs in climate research & a motive for climate tech innovation End of discussion
A rigorous C/B framework by a top level group would be a challenge indeed, but it could help players at least rationally understand the issue. Looks like we’re picking up the same battling rams under Biden as Obama—fire fire pants on fire!
Hi Bjorn. You rely heavily on Nordhaus, @RichardTol and other economists to make your case. So you should be willing to critique my critique of them, should you not? Here it is. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14747731.2020.1807856 ….
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
Shows great scientific neutrality on their part. Anyhoo, for anyone who cares to leave Lomborg-lalaland and rejoin reality, there is more content here 
