Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
It is funny/depressing how this lead author of UN climate report (and self-professed ecosocialist) insist economic statement only be evaluated by natural scientists The problem with widespread climate beliefs is that they're often wildly off, because they ignore adaptation https://twitter.com/JKSteinberger/status/1341825399895060482 …pic.twitter.com/DPNxhZFhxE
eg here: highly respected climate scientists claim that 2m of sea-level rise will lead to 187 million people flooded https://www.pnas.org/content/116/23/11195 … Believed by many — but wrong bc ignores adaptation. Their ref (https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2010.0291 …) says real number is 600x lower at 305,000pic.twitter.com/aVehAeKDmP
Never baffle the GWCC zealots with facts.......back to the gulag for you.
Adaptation will certainly happen, fair point. But what is the chance that it will happen for the rich and not the poor, given persistent global inequality within and between countries? It seems far more likely that the vulnerable will be left behind and end up climate refugees
Assumes an awful lot of dikes. Wave the majic wand Bjorn
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
