8C change!? 
Three main models estimating costs of climate (these are the ones used by Obama Admin): DICE, PAGE + FUND Global warming has real cost, but even strong temp rises cost ~4% of GDP — not end-of-world. Read my 2020 peer-reviewed article: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162520304157 …pic.twitter.com/6PY3xyaS3x
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
-
-
-
3.3's estimate of biodiversity cost, relying on expenditure on protecting biodiversity, seems to ignore that probably the largest cost of protecting biodiversity is the opportunity cost of not using the protected area, which isn't monetised. Did I miss something?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
If the natural ecosystem is destroyed, many people will be unhappy. Even if they presently don't go there as tourists, they might still prefer it survives. Has this been taken into account? Because 0.21% for 4°C seems pretty small.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
yes please give me a chart on how great things would go in a United States with an average temperature of 98°, life will be wonderful, some crops will even bake themselves while they're growing
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
most scientists I learn from say that +4C is a
#MadMax scenario with a few thousand humans seeking refuge in the Arctic...Measuring#climatechange w/#GDP is dangerous at best & suicidal at worstKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
How can you possibly be so oblivious as to think the GDP loss from 8C temperature increase will be within the range -4% to -16%? I trust serious scientists and economists will respond to and correct this foolish tweet and article.
-
I am AGHAST
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.