Is burning wood (biomass) still considered sustainable and carbon neutral! In the UK we have Drax power station converted from burning coal to burning North American forests
-
-
-
Better than letting it burn anyway in California with forrest mismanagement. An then they parade climate change as the cause.

Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
It's insane how anti-CO2 / human mob actually think China is "green". Just another example of the facts not mattering.
-
The greens simply ignore and dismiss publicly any facts they don't like if they are in opposition to their beliefs and they cherry pick facts that can support their position if its taken completely out of context.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
not at all.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
This chart is a huge mess and I haven't even looked into the data. This is percentages so of course a MUCH smaller economy would need much fewer power plants that typically run on coal and such. It just tells us that communist China used to be dirt poor.
-
The renewables in China were also crap. The 1975 Banqiao Dam failure alone is probably worse than all nuclear disasters combined.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Banqiao_Dam_failure …
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
@MaherRonan Bjorn is a good follow on Green madnessKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Wow. This post is wrong on so many levels. It casts a huge dark cloud over everything else this guy says about climate change. Thanks for the reality check.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.