Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
If our giving is multiplied 10x by, say, Gates, we should give more (because your dollar will mean $10 to the good cause) But we don't give more to charity If Gates multiplied a giving to ourselves, we *do* give more https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-020-00950-4?proof=t …pic.twitter.com/SgxFyKfnhX
Getting us to give effectively is just very, very hard. We mostly give in ways that are "reputationally lucrative" — ways that make us look good among our peers https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-020-00950-4?proof=t …pic.twitter.com/fFtyid2VdF
Copenhagen Consensus works with 100s of the world's top economists to find where extra money can do most good Here is our latest global project: longer lines means more effective giving https://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/sites/default/files/post2015brochure_m.pdf … Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prrbooi9PNw … Pod: https://freakonomics.com/podcast/fixing-the-world-bang-for-the-buck-edition-a-new-freakonomics-radio-podcast/ …pic.twitter.com/gJFOvkjJLX
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
