The food and ag correspondent for Mother Jones makes sure that he doesn't actually engage with any arguments, just virtue signaling Startling for some: utterances of virtue don't fix people's houses burning Over the next half-century, only better forest management doeshttps://twitter.com/tomphilpott/status/1306211105858031616 …
-
Agreed that California needs to move into a whole new fire regime, fast. No doubt. But the brunt of your argument is that climate action isn't a priority. That's manna to the fossil fuel industry, and you know it.pic.twitter.com/mBUFmfjmUb
Dear Tom, glad we agree on better forest management That was point of my article On climate, I incessantly say, we should do carbon taxes, green R&D and adaptation Article points out obvious: climate policy won't fix fires If time, check out my book: https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/BasicBooks-Excerpt-False-Alarm.pdf …pic.twitter.com/UaYdwf9mKC
-
-
"...a carbon tax, starting rather low..." gives away the game here—a game that started tedious and has become ridiculous.
-
Yes, why would you want to fix your carbon tax to mainstream estimates of the social cost of carbon? Set it a $1000 per ton, that won't be a problem!!
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.