Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Rich guy telling the world's poor that they have to accept more poverty and energy, they don't want More poverty: Paris agreement -> more poverty https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305750X19301299 … Don't want: 90% w/solar still want grid https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.p20161097 …https://twitter.com/jrockstrom/status/1303044809909768193 …
And he quotes Stiglitz' stunningly false and deceptive hit piece, which contained 12 central claims — of which 12 were false https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/new-york-times-stunningly-false-deceptive-hit-piece-preserve-lomborg/ …pic.twitter.com/lSc1DE1cUQ
Rich guy claiming to protect the poor in order to secure a fossil fuel status quo for themselves. Convenient. Has been used for too long
Gotta love how you go all fact-free: You claim renewables are wonderful then Disregard more poverty Disregard not wanted Disregard your Stiglitz citation is 12xfalse and instead ascribe me intentions you don't know and I don't have
Key Bjorn is climate science today shows clearly that >2C will have massive & rising social costs (>100USD/CO2) that you and Nordhaus ignore
The simple single thing that has allowed billions of the worlds poor to be raised from abject poverty is cheap fossil fuel energy. Cheap energy affects the cost of everything including essential services, food & medicin. Wind & solar installations dramatically increase this cost.
So they’re gonna abandon fossil fuels in the production of millions of EVs. I didn’t know that!?!
For sure. Well said. @jrockstrom and his ilk impose huge burdens on all ppls of the world, not just the poor. Huge burdens paired with very unlikely benefits. Certain downsides such as less reliable power and environmental and fiscal cost of Bad Green.
#PolicyForRiskNotIdeology
Burden? Lets put climate crisis aside. Why exclude poor from future? Cheaper, cleaner, more decentralised, domestic, energy. Coal? Dead end
You’re evil. You produce a “business case” where a loss of $1 a day by the worlds richest billion (to address climate crisis) is worth more than a billion people whose total income is a $1 a day facing total devastation. You don’t give a toss about the worlds poorest.pic.twitter.com/SvRgC0cUdR
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
