Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Stop Blaming Climate Change For California’s Fires. Many Forests, Including The Redwoods, Need Them. via @forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2020/08/24/stop-blaming-climate-change-for-californias-fires-many-forests-including-the-redwoods-need-them/ …pic.twitter.com/6PF0akVzQG
NYTimes reported that the wildfires destroyed a forest of ancient redwood trees in Big Basin state park Actually, the vast majority of trees still standing. What was burned up was the visitor’s center and other park infrastructure.pic.twitter.com/zcAoRd5DL0
Usually the killer of trees from fire is the heat cooking the foliage. With their foliage ~100ft above, the large redwoods largely avoid this. They are adapted to fire and will take advantage of the cleared area to produce more offspring.
The cones need the heat of fires in order to open up and seed. That simple.
Can confirm. I was there. A few stands of trees crowned near the visitor center. Many others got singed, but will survive. The vast vast vast majority of that forest was completely unscathed. It was a tiny fraction that burned.
You are correct. But again, wildfires and forest fires are two different things. Wildfires, like global warming, are human caused phenomena. They have been around a lot longer than global warming. Global warming MAY be contributory. It is not causative.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
