NYT climate coverage is completely hopeless. I was a subscriber for 5 years and kept hoping to find a shred of fairness. Finally gave up.
My reply to Stiglitz in New York Times — even if they only allowed a short reply to their stunningly false and deceptive hit piece, excising a more detailed response and the link to a full-blown reply (but you can see it here: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/new-york-times-stunningly-false-deceptive-hit-piece-preserve-lomborg/ …) https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/14/books/review/letters-to-the-editor.html …pic.twitter.com/WvXX3BNo7N
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
—in the end, despite the flaws in both books, yours and Shellenberger's do a service in calling out the environmental alarmism and hysteria that obscure environmental debates rather than illuminate them… and that should be also acknowledged, indeed… ;)https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2020/08/10/alternatives-to-climate-alarmism/ …
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.