See previous false statements:https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1289222199417561088 …
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
See previous false statements:https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1289222199417561088 …
Here is the description of the stunningly long list of false and deceptive claims from New York Times
Of its 12 central, critical claims, 12 are false
Deplorable fact-checking
#FalseClaimsToPreserveAlarmismhttps://www.linkedin.com/pulse/new-york-times-stunningly-false-deceptive-hit-piece-preserve-lomborg/ …
New York Times & Stiglitz don't want to see their alarmism debunked: Don’t read his book with the economic evidence! It is ”dangerous” Don't look at the data! It is "mind-pollution” Well, fortunately, you can read for yourself: https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/BasicBooks-Excerpt-False-Alarm.pdf …pic.twitter.com/L8Lp2V5x6X
Stiglitz calls himself an economist? Did he skip economics 101? The part that says economics studies the use of scarce resources with alternative uses?
It's possible in a computer model. Just like people can die multiple times in a computer model. A computer model is a reality on to itself and does not need to obey the laws of the physical universe. It need be no more real than any video game.
Because Stiglitz like so many other intellectuals out there are not going to pay the price for their rhetoric. Thing would be very different when they start putting their money where their mouth is.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.