The New York Times’ review of my new, climate-realist book is a deceptive and false hit piece. Of its 12 central, critical claims a stunning 12 are false. This is deplorable fact-checking from @nytimesbookshttps://www.linkedin.com/pulse/new-york-times-stunningly-false-deceptive-hit-piece-preserve-lomborg …
Thanks for your kind words. Just to clarify, I say we shouldn't experience a false alarm (like children believing they will have no future, 48% of adults across the world believing climate will likely lead to human extinction). But climate is a real problem we should fix smartly
-
-
I'm not saying it isn't a problem for humans, but has anyone considered that we are technically in an ice age? In other words, if year-round ice at the poles is not the norm for the planet, why are baseline temps considered normal?
-
Because the modern coastline depends on it.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
So in other words your point is that climate change is real, presents real problems but is not apocalyptic? Sounds reasonable to me.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.