This harms the poor.pic.twitter.com/WygcnwYTno
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Can you provide adaptation solutions for all of the above impacts to help the poor because obviously spending is too expensive for the rich. Who's going to save them? Mitigation helps treat the cause, adapting is a hail mary attempt to survive the symptoms. Where are your morals?pic.twitter.com/1Tm6HaiwMP
It hurts the poor in the developed world too. A lot of people in Europe are already energy-poor, and cannot pay to keep their house warm in winter. Or aren’t able to buy nutritious food for at least meal a day. (In holland we too have a lot of people living of food banks)
I get ZERO answers if I ask: - Have you though that by raising carbon taxes, if there is no substitute (as cheap as fossils), it WILL result rise in the price of energy? Then most Africans cannot afford to cook their food and diseases will flourish. *Total silence*
Self promoting nonsense.
We do not have to fix it at all. There is nothing wrong with it. The climate is behaving itself perfectly normally & has for millions of years without any input needed from humans who are patently & hopelessly ignorant of the how the climate works. If it ain't broke don't fix it
Climate science has failed to understand & fix the problem of climate change because there in no problem. Modeling, diagnosing explaining or fixing a problem does not work when there is no problem in the first place. problem. Climate science not understanding this is a worry.
The first food-bank ever in the Netherlands was introduced just a few months after the euro was introduced.
Joseph Stiglitz really doesn’t like this book.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.