true but that's exactly the point isn't it ? flattening the curve so : - the severe cases can be handled in non saturated ICU facilities - other grave diseases can also be treated in ICU, preventing illegitimate (due to lack of ICU beds) deaths
Giesecke in Lancet: Most people in the world will become infected Stopping the spread is futile Our goal should be getting optimal care Strong lockdown only pushes severe cases into the future https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31035-7/fulltext …pic.twitter.com/qzPiPSVIQW
-
-
-
Also, giving time to gain the upper hand on testing and tracking in order to open up sensibly and quickly respond to suppress incipient resurgence with a focused control. Vaccines are a long term hope for the more vulnerable in the population.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Not even Gieseckis closest colleagues take him serious. Last week he said 6 million Stockholmers had had the virus. There are 2 million irl. This week he said that 98% of infected doesn’t notice anything at all. He usually refers to his “gut feeling” when asked about sources.
-
it's just a fact that less than over 98% either do not get sick or have mild symptoms they recover from without medical intervention as with influenza .. of course we need to protect the old and ill .. those in nursing homes .. that's just common sense and always done
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Old statistics, more than 3000 deaths now. A complete disaster. The economy is in free fall. Worse than neighboring countries who are opening up.pic.twitter.com/oihylJ0iy6
Keskustelun loppu
-
-
-
in a year or even looking today you will find the hospitalizations and deaths very low in tropical countries and that lockdowns in tropical counties over COVID-19 counterproductive killing 10,000s less able to access medical treatment due to restrictions in transportation
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
It is perhaps true what he says, most of the twitterazi is not qualified to say. What is clear is he is not being honest about the cost. He argues for example for an IFR of .1% which has already been surpassed in NYC.
-
This being said, i think most countries will opt for the Swedish approach with a few tweaks such as face masks, but for political reasons it will be called something else. Already here in Spain doctors are saying the government is not being honest with case numbers and ....
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Here's another interesting approach: http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/general-update-may-6/#comment-503035 …pic.twitter.com/NioRl23G0n
Keskustelun loppu
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.