Why Sweden is not doing as bad as you think: 1) sustainable in the long run 2) less economic damage https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-swedish-experiment-looks-like-it-s-paying-off …pic.twitter.com/7B8ggClZJf
-
Conjecture presented as fact. ps. Sweden is doing appallingly relative to Scandinavian peers.
Just remember — Sweden has seen more deaths than its Scandiavian peers, but partly because many more people got infected What matters is how many die (and economy) across the entire corona pandemic, and here studies show hard lockdown not besthttps://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1250837429910724613 …
-
-
It's 1 guy basically, after the UK imperial team who were similarly inclined changed their minds Maybe it is right regardless, but certainly that is NOT what the evidence is suggesting at this stage
-
Studies from the spanish flu suggest hard lockdown is most efficient foe both limiting amount of dead and economy recovery.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Bjorn - are you assuming that (a) infections confer long-term immunity and (b) that once infected, individuals cannot become reinfected? (not the same thing)
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
and many more people got infected because Sweden didn't implement lockdowns as harsh as their nordic peers. So currently the Swedish approach appears to be a failure. But as the study you linked to says, total casualties until the end of the epidemic is what matters.
-
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Your testing per million is appalling, deaths are not
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.