Then why do other countries in the EU do not look at the successful Swedish methods?
-
-
-
The article literally explains why - certain conditions that exist in Sweden aren't the same elsewhere
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
If Stockholm has herd immunity while other cities around the world are getting hit by a second wave, they'll be looking good.
- Näytä vastaukset
-
-
-
Well, maybe the people saw the rising number of deaths and isolated more than before even without the government ordering a lockdown. Also why is it a success that infections are supposedly stabilizing? I thought they sought to achieve quick herd immunity?
-
Can't this stabilization be due to the effects of partial herd immunity? Without effective antibody tests, it is hard to know, no?
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Yes and the results are not impressive. Much higher than the other Nordic and Baltic states. Austria has roughly the same total # of cases, ~14.5K, but 1089 fewer deaths, new cases yesterday were 46 while Sweden had 392. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
The elephant in the room is how much immunity does somebody who has had the virus have-is it stronger if the infection is more severe-how long does immunity last - is there any such thing as immunity to this virus?-all so far unanswered. Sweden are clearly taking a huge risk here
-
If you do not build immunity from having the infection, how then will a vaccin give you immunity? If immunity is not possible, we are all dead anyway.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.