Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Bjorn - help us out, is this telling us we either have to ? a) have a completely broken world economy, no social life etc (and the risks that brings eg WW3) Or b) accept millions of deaths to maintain sole sense of “life as we know it”
We can get either, both or neither. Right now, lots of countries are locking down, ignoring long-run strategy This could mean we end up with long lock-down, destroying economy, but then can't endure more lockdowns next fall etc, leading to both failed economy and many dead
we could also do Sweden, which is moderate (but not no) cost, and likely imagine keeping this up for a long run, with moderate deaths
(finally, notice that the strong lock-down as we saw in Italy and other places was probably necessary at the time, even if it might have been better to go to 'Sweden' precautions earlier)
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
