"But we don't have any choice. We are starving. If we stay at home, we may save ourselves from the virus. But who will save us from starvation?" Western countries in a few months?
"If we don't have food in our stomach, what's the use of observing this lockdown?"http://afp.omni.se/starving-bangladesh-garment-workers-protest-for-pay-during-lockdown/a/MRrvgK …
-
-
-
Nah, farms haven't shut down. OECD is rich enough to feed itself even if no one else works.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Look at this interesting article denuding the myths we’ve been fed on coronavirus. https://swprs.org/a-swiss-doctor-on-covid-19/ …
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
But really thats the wrong question. People will say we need to send aid there. The real question is what is the most efficient way to have most immune? Bjorn, love your work. Would love to know better stats from Sweden. How many truly infected? Changes death rate.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
This is why there was no lockdown in 1918, more than half the world would have starved to death instead of <10% dying of the Spanish Flu.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
If we don’t have food due to climate change and ecosystem collapse, what’s the use of economic growth and this SUV?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.