Oh STHU!!!! Dangerous fool!
-
-
-
And how is he wrong?
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Yes, and it is worth reading in full: It says that climate impact first detectable in the 2040s https://sciencebrief.org/briefs/wildfires …pic.twitter.com/GBq1fbyYgH
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
Wondering the detail you omitted that shows this is full of crap.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
the one factor that has expanded at a nearly exponential rate since the rise in industrial atmospheric gases would be the proliferation of reporters and cameras bringing instantaneous anxiety right to our homes...which lead to bigger audiences and profits, not coincidentally.
-
Correct. There’s vast attention paid to everything now, like daytraders in markets reacting to everything as significant. The media provide the narrative, like fitting every conceivable detail to one single narrative/ story now: global warming. Beware one story!
#crowdsarewrong
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
hallo
@VQuaschning, hier spricht die Empirie. und nicht der Glaube an Voodoo !Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Yep, our Bjorn, confusing savannah grass fires with forest fires again for fun and profit. How much do they pay you for each deceptic Tweet
-
What is factually wrong in showing that less than 2% of the country actually burnt? Compare that to the slew of fake images that have now taken their toll on the tourist industry? 40% of bookings from key markets have been cancelled! https://www.michaelsmithnews.com/2020/01/climate-alarmism-bushfire-coverage-has-smashed-australias-tourism-industry.html …
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.