Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
You show a total lack of understanding on the basics of fire activity in Australia, and therefore, of why we say this years fires in the SE are associated with climate change with different drivers from those occurring in the rest the country.
Dear Pep, I attempt to put the current conversation into perspective. The whole burnt area was constantly mentioned, so I think my point is entirely valid. However, I'd love if you could share research that shows you expect SE forests to burn more, but not the savanna?
My understanding of the research is that global warming will affect *both* types in Australia with approx the same factor increase That is both increases in burnt area in forests and in savanna doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/104015
Warming of the oceans causes more perception. Global Warming is a hoax. Climate changing is only helping wet dry areas.
Gday Bjorn. Appreciate your work. But I think this example is not apt. Aus bushfires generally occur in the savanna which has a very variable but perhaps increasing rainfall. Aus subtropical forrests are generally all facing significant rainfall decreases.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
