They show some graphs and literally worry about how people are being better off The crucial graphs are just "linked at least in part to climate change" Can't make this uppic.twitter.com/gz9nb3zTML
Näytä tämä ketju
You would imagine these 11,000 scientists at least were able to put together a coherent argument for why there is "an emergency" They don't — they just ramble what seems like 1970s limits-to-growth thoughts Read the paper It is sadhttps://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-50302392 …
-
-
-
Compare scientists' concerns with people who are actually faced with the world's big problems From the largest UN poll of global priorities: of almost 10m people, they — not surprisingly — care about education, health, jobs, no corruption and nutrition http://data.myworld2015.org/ pic.twitter.com/AjbnokNCvg
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
And push for the same 70s totalitarian solutions.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
And repeatedly lie by saying nothing has been done
-
I read the BBC report as far as the claims about deforestation. In the last 35 years forests are growing and Europe has more than it did 100 years ago. At that point I decided it's bollocks.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
The funny thing is it will be these threads that slowly get more desperate as time goes on.
- Näytä vastaukset
-
-
-
The science between natural variability and human caused global warming is not confirmed, the tipping point theory is meant to confirm it’s all caused by humans. Is that science or politics?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Surely if there really was a ‘Clear and unequivocal’ emergency we would be seeing some signs of it by now.
-
Like cancer you mean Dave
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.