Yet, even saying something this obvious and correct but inconvenient make true believers apoplectichttps://twitter.com/guardiannews/status/1191422303587975169 …
Näytä tämä ketju
Can we just have everyone accept that *many* many more people die from cold than heat (17:1, https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(14)62114-0/fulltext …) And that in Ireland, almost *no one* die from heat, but lots of people die from cold (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412017310346 …)pic.twitter.com/ZnOEBDOQOS
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
The articles are worth reading. The delay effect due to cold is an important point. Tried to figure out how they adjusted for practitioner definition bias in cause of death but could not tease it out. People used to die of consumption before underlying diseases were known.
-
Does heat or cold contribute more to infectious disease, diabetes, heart disease, cancer and the other main killers?
Just not clear.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Is there somewhere in the linked Guardian article where anyone does not accept this? I read it twice and couldn't find anyone saying that, but perhaps I missed it.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
From this peer-reviewed study, I propose that we allow global warming to continue until the global number of deaths due to cold matches the global death count due to heat.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.