First, NYTimes has not really thought about what life is actually like in the Mekong River Deltapic.twitter.com/o9kAutCdo3
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Maybe NYTimes should have hesitated when they saw the world's 14th largest airport underwater. (Again, academically correct, if you ignore dikes, but not good for predicting the end of Holland)pic.twitter.com/TVDDZEjzAQ
NYTimes should have shown us a new understanding of the issue of sea-level rise: Yes, challenge, but one we've already mostly successfully tackled for 110 million people around the world Instead, this misuse of an almost entirely red map for southern Vietnam generates *fear*pic.twitter.com/mWLO29dTbf
Many outlets ran with this, telling us that sea-level rise will put 20 million underwater, instead of actually showing us we're tackling it for almost 110 million nowpic.twitter.com/4C5GK6OQcx
One can only hope that NYTimes will update their reporting on this, *actually* showing the additional impact from now to 2050. That would be a useful understanding, showcasing what adaptation can actually achievepic.twitter.com/YSAxUkwput
@nytimes ignores their own backyard where construction in a growing flood zone - Long Island City - has been massive with little mitigation/adaptation plans or steps. (Let alone Miami...) http://dcp.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=1c37d271fba14163bbb520517153d6d5 …pic.twitter.com/QPFOhZ4yB5
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.