Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Right, if only question of temp, clearly lower is better. BUT, costs for lower-temp policies. If those costs are higher than the extra benefits, we probably shouldn't go for them Point of 5MPH — there are also huge costs to trade, mobility, continental integration etc
Absolutely, informed choices based on science and economics The only Nobel Laureate climate economist, Nordhaus, shows that 1.5°C is not only impossible but striving towards it would be phenomenally more expensive than its cost https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/pol.20170046 …pic.twitter.com/nmtnN304op
Clearly a lower temperature is better? Prove it.
Why is a lower temperature better?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
