Why not have both zero TB and a healthy climate?
Turns out, I was wrong Instead of wasting €40 billion on climate, Germany has now decided to up the waste by 250%, spending €100 billion instead Still a terrible idea. Cut global temps by 0.0045°C, could save 25 million lives http://afp.omni.se/afp-alert/a/VbkodJ …https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1173524428841476099 …
-
-
-
Because the wishing List is stuck at Santa and People are living in the real World.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
"Thought I made a mistake once, turns out I was wrong."
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Going from €40bn to €100bn is "upping" by €60bn, which is 150% of the original.
-
Doesn't the waste start at 0?
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
If Germany spends €100 billions, many will earn their share of these billions. That's good for the economy and business.
-
Not for the economy as a whole if this leads to inefficiency... And it will a lot. Of course there are some who will benefit but the society doesn't... The side effects will be - frankly said - challenging.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
You are still wrong. You have no clue what an increase or decrease to global temperatures will do to death rates.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
The GWPF have produced this excellent quiz, https://www.playbuzz.com/item/af7c2201-9cea-4b05-85cb-e826e021b6cc … I think they have got the answer to question 4 wrong.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.