Germany's government wants to spend €40bn over next 4 years to cut CO₂. This will cut global temps by 0.00018°C The same money spent on tuberculosis could save more than 10 million lives What is best? Time to talk about prioritieshttps://www.dw.com/en/germanys-ruling-coalition-plans-to-spend-40-billion-on-climate-protection/a-50436320 …
-
-
Estimated we can eradicate tuberculosis if we ramp up spending to $13bn/yr, or $5.4bn more on average. That means Germany's $44.25bn could fund the entire necessary tb spend for the next (44.25/5.4=) 8.2 years, saving about 1.3m lives/yr, or 10.66m liveshttps://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-the-moral-and-economic-case-for-action-to-end-tuberculosis/ …
Näytä tämä ketjuKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Cool, that you know, it is linear. I think, you are the only one. Apart from climate effects, the spent amount will have numerous other positive effects, which you of course ignore.
-
So, because the $ trillion won't fix any warming, let's spend it anyhow because you have other incentives. Is that the message?
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
You’re assuming a linear relationship between co2 and temperature. I think it’s actually a logarithmic relationship.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
But what if there's ZERO connection between economic activities' co2 emissions and a resulting cooling or heating of the earth's surface

! Fourier & Arrenhius' co2 'conjecture' apparently has never been proven and these two men had no knowledge of atmospheric physics. T or F!Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.