Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Germany's government wants to spend €40bn over next 4 years to cut CO₂. This will cut global temps by 0.00018°C The same money spent on tuberculosis could save more than 10 million lives What is best? Time to talk about prioritieshttps://www.dw.com/en/germanys-ruling-coalition-plans-to-spend-40-billion-on-climate-protection/a-50436320 …
Background: not clear how the €40 billion would be spent. I assume that it — generously — could allow Germany to actually reach its 2020 40% below 1990-level emissions. It is right now estimated to reach 32%, so 8% of 1990 1251Mt CO₂e is 100Mt CO₂ehttps://www.cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/germanys-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-climate-targets …
For 4 years, that is 400Mt CO₂e IPCC estimates that 3,667 Gt CO₂ can reduce temperatures by 0.8-2.5°C, with the most likely outcome at 0.45°C per 1,000 Gt CO₂. That translates the 0.4Gt CO₂e roughly into 0.4*0.45/1000=0.00018°C https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2016.0457 …pic.twitter.com/7FMPAevnq1
Estimated we can eradicate tuberculosis if we ramp up spending to $13bn/yr, or $5.4bn more on average. That means Germany's $44.25bn could fund the entire necessary tb spend for the next (44.25/5.4=) 8.2 years, saving about 1.3m lives/yr, or 10.66m liveshttps://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-the-moral-and-economic-case-for-action-to-end-tuberculosis/ …
Educated Guess: Several NGOs will catch the money and burn it for nonsense projects.
That is quite the assumption. Considering their miserable track record with the energiewende, I have no faith that the germans wouldn't just squander all the money on feel-good measures.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
