This is a simplification, but my understanding of your standpoint is that climate change exists, it is bad, will get worse, but there are other things that should have priority now. We'll be wealthier in future & can deal with it then. That a reasonable summary?
Let’s be clear. Climate change is not worse than we thought. That does mean it’s not a reality or not a problem. It is. But the narrative that the world’s climate is changing from bad to worse is unhelpful alarmist.
Learn more in my latest for @prageru:https://youtu.be/tUR0LrSadkg
-
-
-
If so, any future response would need to be global. If you look at the state & trend for international cooperation, do you believe that any form of global crisis will be met with a measured response based on evidence? When should we start laying the groundwork for cooperation?
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Let's be clear. You're regurgitating the work of economists who know SFA about climate. https://www.patreon.com/posts/bjorn-lomborg-27523495 ….
-
But again, so are u stevekeen
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Bjorn Lomborg has some good points but he is very selective in his 'evidence'. He disregards the risk of catastrophic climate effects , he ignores the impact on non - humans, and he exaggerates the current cost of renewable alternatives.
Keskustelun loppu
-
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
-
-
Co2 is not the driver of climate
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Why must climate change be bad? Why can’t it be good?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.