The fire emission estimates (for all of the Amazon, also the one outside Brazil) suggests that 2019 is not in any way a record http://www.globalfiredata.org/forecast.html pic.twitter.com/IxOUXXyW62
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
The fire emission estimates (for all of the Amazon, also the one outside Brazil) suggests that 2019 is not in any way a record http://www.globalfiredata.org/forecast.html pic.twitter.com/IxOUXXyW62
Robert Walker has a great walk-through of why the Brazilian INPE is in general a great science outlet and we should likely trust their deforestation estimates, but how the number-of-fires estimates are not reliablehttps://www.science20.com/robert_walker/nasa_say_the_amazon_is_burning_at_below_average_rates_yet_many_news_stories_say_record_rates-240959 …
not what @NASAEarth is tweeting. Seems like you're trying to confuse?
What do the media actually get right?
Facts can't derail the narrative...
Thanks for speaking up. Brazil is under heavy attack by the media and their leftist friends, and opportunistic leaders such as Macron are taking advantage of this in a desperate try to cancel the Mercosul-UE deal (which will cost them a lot)
Didn’t Macron post an aerial photo from years ago when he tweeted about the current fire
to b fair the media was using the same pic implying it was a current photo when it wasn’t 
Ya, a couple of desperate, failing politicians, up to their eyeballs in corruption and scandals at home have jumped the climate change shark trying to divert attention from their issues at the G7.pic.twitter.com/M0hfVZ3r0x
Link to article please?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.