It's a loss of economic production. I have no idea what you mean by "going towards."
It turns out that humanity will be much better off – including in Africa – in a scenario of high fossil-fuel use than it would be even if we succeeded in achieving a benign low-CO₂ world.
Learn more in my latest for @ProSyn:http://ow.ly/ijE650vFuce
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
-
-
-
Bjorn's argument for business as usual is unbelievably complacent.
#climatebrawl -
Your response to his argument is unbelievably vacuous. Do you have, you know, an actual argument to offer?
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I have suspected from the outset that you have always conceded the global warming and CO2 causation in order to avoid being attacked on those grounds and marginalized. I find that disappointing.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Specially indoors, is this connection to air quality and mental health holds, indoor expo ‘‘tis much more intensehttps://twitter.com/natgeo/status/1164526488126939136?s=21 …
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I love how the doomsayers never give specifics on how we must stop climate change. It's just the broad brushed "eliminate fossil fuels" crap.
-
If they'd say nuclear, they'd jeopardize their solar business.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
There is no “solving” climate change.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Only 15% of the world's population practice open defecation? Apparently, you haven't been to San Francisco lately!
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.