Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Which is why electric cars should be subsidized (but only a bit) in the West, and taxed heavily in the East (on average taxed at $1,095, that is a *negative* subsidy) https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.20150897 …pic.twitter.com/9Obm1GsMEM
Electric cars on average deliver *negative* environmental benefits of 0.73¢/mi relative to comparable gasoline cars 3.2¢ benefits in Los Angeles, -3.1¢ in ND 1¢ benefits in cities, -1.7¢ outside https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.20150897 …pic.twitter.com/QmeNBZZ5W9
So, in what states should oranges be subsided and in what states should they be taxed? In which states should the collie/retriever index be increased and which decreased? Surely there must be a plan for that.
Neither gasoline nor electric cars should be subsidized. Politicians and “researchers” should leave the markets alone a let our technologies evolve without distortion.
There are obviously certain instances where public policy to distort markets is needed (eg zone layer and Montreal Protocol) but other where the market itself can lead to the best outcome possible.
2 thoughts, what would the statistic look like when all energy would be made by nuclear, and secondly is it fair to compare mostly high end 40k plus cars with a general avarage that has also 15k cars in the mix ?
What if your electric grid is FULL hydronuclear (no intermitent renewable, no fossil)
Hmmm.... no hidden agenda here 
Bingo, says the other 5 mil. Danes and my wife's Uncle Kaj (pronounced ki )
That's at $41/ton. The paper says at $51/ton, mean benefit improved to to -0.62¢/mi. "Country-level social cost of carbon" [Ricke 2018] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0282-y … gives co2 cost as $417 (66% CI $177–$805). Extrapolating even to $177 improves mean benefit to +1.0¢/mi .
Also, that's with the coal-heavy grid of 2010-2012. The paper also modelled a "what if we transition from coal to natural gas, as we are currently doing", and found positive mean benefit of 0.56¢/mi. Putting the two together, EVs would have a positive benefit of ~1.50¢/mi, no?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
