"democratic party candidates" and "incorrectly" are largely interchangeable concepts. only @TulsiGabbard has one foot on the ground.
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
The only way to safely & practically reduce the use of fossil fuels is to reduce the demand, not cut off the supply. This can only be done by innovating as cheap alternative energy supply.
-
Demand can be reduced with efficiency and smarter machines, like cars, ships or trucks, or better building design, indeed. Hybrids or gas instead of coal or heavy oil for power plants, ships or heavy trucks one low hanging fruit that could be accelerated.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Exaggerating? The Arctic is on fire and the Arctic Ocean will soon be ice free in Summer; accelerating global warming. Why you continue to promote business a usual in a
#ClimateEmergency is baffling. -
There is no climate emergency.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Researching alternative green energy sources isn't enough. The hard part is to make them production-ready. Waiting for a scientific breakthrough is high risk. Germany pushed the research and development of sustainable energy by creating a framework, which subsidizes green energy.
-
Small but continuous efficiency improvements made wind power and solar highly competitive over a 20 years period. Similar things will happen with electric cars. Battery capacity increases about 4% a year, which in turn means that e-car become 100% more efficient in about 16 years
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Coal is already no longer competitive https://energypost.eu/cheaper-than-coal-irenas-comprehensive-report-on-cost-declines-all-renewables-categories/ … The rest of the article was really vague .. investing in what? What different plan do you propose compared to the Democrats for example? What about other sectors than energy?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Dr. Lomborg, do you support the findings of the
#SR15 of the@IPCC_CH? -#climatechange#climatecrisis#climatebrawl -
No, he only supports the dubious finding (in the AR5) from Nordhaus et al that 4° warming would only result in 3,5% lower GDP and is therefore „optimal“. Irrespective of ocean acidification, desertification, heat-related deaths in the tropics, arctic environmental collapse etc.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.