”$US84bn annually. This will likely produce the green technologies that can outcompete fossil fuels.” What is the evidence behind this claim?
A realistic & credible response to global warming needs to bring China and India on board. They are not going to slow their economies and imperil the fossil-fuel-driven growth that is lifting millions out of poverty. More in my latest for The Australian: http://ow.ly/MAty50va6wO pic.twitter.com/xUymqThRkm
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
China and India are part of the global response .. even leading in some fields, so not sure what that even means.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
The most prosperous and lucrative sector of wealthy countries, the fossil fuel industry, is under fire by the climate change cabal. Why? Simple. It's all about the money. They want to replace the fossil fuel industry and become the NEW most prosperous and lucrative sector.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Any proposed solution to climate change must be cost-effective. People care more about keeping their jobs and electrical appliances today than about what's going to happen to the climate 50 years from now. As Keynes once said, "In the long-run, you're dead."
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
& then there are the casual assumptions about African population growth. Were that to be married with any kind equable living standards.......
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.