Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
This is bogus nonsense. Scenarios represent different outcomes and averaging them is meaningless. It also excludes all benefits. You have also ignored the other major modelling for the NZ Government which showed lower costs.
Bob, that's just silly. We average to show most likely outcome. What is 'other major modelling'? The only one you've shown is *exactly* the one I shared, but averaging 2020-50 (where costs obviously are smaller). And yes, using that is bogus nonsense for costs in 2050
The authors of the study did not cite an average number. You just made it up. And you have ignored the Vivid Economics study. You have shown why you cannot be trusted on these issues.
Climate minister @jamespeshaw hasn't estimated the benefits of his zero carbon bill. I asked him under NZ freedom of information laws.https://utopiayouarestandinginit.com/2019/06/10/so-jamespeshaw-mfe_news-havent-got-a-clue-what-good-the-zerocarbonbill-will-do/ …
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
