Sadly, there are still people who think Lomborg has a shred of credibility in #climate field
"4°C is not end-of-the-world, it is a problem, equiv. to reducing average income by about 3-4% in 2100"
At 4ºC, global economic, agri & political collapse locked in, says World Bankhttps://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1152146791829331969 …
I suggest the UN Climate Panel is a better reference than a known, alarmist report: Cost of 1.5°C at 0.3% of GDP by 2100 2°C at 0.5% of GDP by 2100 3.6°C at 2.6% of GDP by 2100 Problem, not by ANY standards end-of-world p256,https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/chapter-3/ …pic.twitter.com/jCv8IqJeDm
-
-
In your link the IPCC says; "[it is]necessary and even vital to maintain the global temperature increase below 1.5°C versus higher levels"
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
"Checking 20 years worth of projections shows that the [IPCC] has consistently underestimated the pace and impacts of global warming." https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-science-predictions-prove-too-conservative/ …
#ClimateEmergencyKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
The Nordhaus report mentions some rather significant omissions in the impact analyses studied:pic.twitter.com/iri6hbXOiA
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.