Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Here is the UN Climate Panel estimates of incomes https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378016300681?via%3Dihub … OECD/Africa accessible here: https://tntcat.iiasa.ac.at/SspDb/dsd pic.twitter.com/biIVNitZwy
The new 1.5°C UN Climate Panel report quoted the cost of 1.5°C at 0.3% of GDP by 2100 2°C at 0.5% of GDP by 2100 3.6°C at 2.6% of GDP by 2100 Problem, not by ANY standards end-of-world p256, https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/chapter-3/ …pic.twitter.com/fYlND1Vk4g
Does anyone know the average temperature rise most climate scientists predict. Has there been a survey.
No, you should not.
Really? Sadly taken out of context (which is why there is no link: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/oct/14/climatechange-scienceofclimatechange …). Argues we should check our models against data and experience. Entirely ignores that I *right before* confirm sea level rise. And here earlier from Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/jul/14/climatechange …pic.twitter.com/maLGyNGYp9
How hard a concept is it to grasp that not everything can be reduced to a single dimension?
What other dimensions do you think there are, and how do you propose to quantify costs and benefits in those dimensions, if not in economic terms?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
