Bjorn LomborgVarmennettu tili

The author likewise seems ignorant of the latest iteration of nuclear power, generation 4. It uses nuclear waste as fuel and can't melt down. Zero emissions.

Assuming there is an incentive to develop said technology.

Many in the globalists club know there is no true planet-ending crisis at hand. They simply see it as a vehicle it acquire more top-down control. They lives by a different code of conduct than the proloteriate.

Shoot. They didn't post the solution. Was there a page missing?

What "climate change?" Cooling or Warming? And why couldn't you say so? Trying to stop climate from changing on your resume? http://SmartestMan.Ca/globalwarming 

Here's how to combat the climate change (that isn't). Stop running around the third world, demanding that populations grow exponentially by providing medical care, pharmaceuticals, water purification systems, food, agricultural assistance. etc.

"Unless and until the storage question of nuclear waste is resolved, nuclear power can hardly be seen as a rational answer to climate change." This is a ridiculous statement if you believe, as some do, that climate change is an "existential threat" to humanity.

First according to AL Gore Mr climate change New York was to be under water 10 years ago. 1 generation ago wasnt suppose to know what snow is. Our earth has been in climate change from the day it formed completely hot to iceages and man had nothing to do with it still doesn't.