The narrative needs a villain and it can't be the "the people" so "evil corporations" will have to do.
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Given how poisonous the Nature editors are about profits I think we can assume they are silly Socialists. "... pharmaceutical companies are reluctant to invest unless they are likely to reap large profits, so progress is slow."
-
Typically capitalism and well managed markets are really good at allocating resources effectively and efficiently distributing goods. Profit is the tool that tells us we are being efficient and not squandering resources. Doh!
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Exactly!
Keskustelun loppu
-
-
-
Says folks who used paper from trees and shipped magazines that were delivered by hydrocarbon burning vehicles.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
The "tiny upside", for those keeping track of political "scientist" Lomborg at home, is having a livable ecosystem to inhabit in 50-100 years.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Also, NASA pushed Apollo to the moon with a firehose of money. We built a limited ability to mount expeditions into the void. We did not build actual space flight capability. The Shuttle didn’t either. A technology requires an ecology. We are on the verge of one.
-
Apollo was a campaign of the Cold War. It convinced the Soviets not to go toe-to-toe with the USA in a technology. Concorde/TU144 reinforced that lesson and extended it to all of the West. Apollo is why the Soviets feared the SDI. They thought we could make it work.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.