Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Solar and wind at ¢5/kWh — when the sun is shining and the wind is blowing. If you want it with batteries included and at 100%, the cost soars to an unaffordable $0.70-$1.1/kWh http://euanmearns.com/the-cost-of-wind-solar-power-batteries-included/ …
(Note, calculated using only batteries, at a third of the current cost. If using biomass (questionable CO₂ savings, and certainly other environmental costs), or demand curtailment, costs could be lower)
I thought biomass was bloody expensive as well Or am I mistaken?
What is the reasoning for calculating with batteries at a one third of the current cost? Is it to account for future drops in the price of batteries? Also, do you have a rough number for fossil fuel energy cost per kw/h?
how about hotwater as energy storage?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
