The point isn't to ignore GDP. The point is that it shouldn't be used as a single indicator.
Of course 
GDP is linked to standards of living. But we must look at a range of indicators regularly or risk the world being like the US, scoring in GDP and poorly in many others
GDP remains the single best indicator to guide government policies. Ignoring it in favor of alternative measures of wellbeing is likely to lower people’s overall quality of life.https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/new-zealand-wellbeing-budget-gdp-advantages-by-bjorn-lomborg-2019-06 …
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Mexico's President has other data. And, of course, you are not taking into account honesty and corruption statistics. He'll prove you wrong... "me canso ganso".
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Can you please explain how growth can continue forever on a finite planet. Do you believe that the world is a globe with a limited amount of resources?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Depends on what could be considered as a 'good' quality of life. Have enough money to buy a lot of unnecessary stuff? Travel three times a year?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
If we share natural wealth equally, we won't need a gov't policy of 'measuring wellbeing'. Charge fees to industries that put pollution / deplete natural resources; Give fee proceeds to all people. If random polls show most ppl want reduced impacts of any kind, raise that fee.pic.twitter.com/2ePFby2PKU
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Shifting to more inscrutable benchmarks is just avoiding responsibility, accountability and just plain passing the Buck
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.